|
For
the Record: A Response
By
Rev. Charles Cooper
In a recent
review of the book The Rapture Question Answered Plain and Simple
by Robert Van Kampen, Dr. Mal Couch, President of Tyndale Theological
Seminary and Bible Institute, misrepresented the facts.
Dr. Couch
writes in The Conservative Theological Journal (December,
1997) on pages 236-237:
Van Kampen
also quotes Dr. John F. Walvoord, former president of Dallas Theological
Seminary, from his book The Rapture Question (Findlay,
OH: n.d., 1957, p.148), ". . . neither posttribulationism
or pretribulationism is an explicit teaching of the Scriptures.
The Bible does not, in so many words, state either."
But does
Walvoord actually write this? The quote from page 148 of Walvoord's
book actually is a poor paraphrase, by Van Kampen, from a statement
by George Ladd . . .
Nowhere
could this author find Walvoord writing on page 148, or any other
page, the quote Van Kampen attributes to him. Van Kampen's "quote"
could be a deliberate garbled composite of the statement above
from Walvoord's book. We hope this is not the case.
For the
record, I want to set forth clearly what is written in the first
edition of The Rapture Question by Dr. John F. Walvoord.
Because Dr. Couch all but called Mr. Van Kampen a liar, I photocopied
the actual page out of the book while visiting Dallas Theological
Seminary on Wednesday, February 11, 1998. It is reproduced here
(along with the title page) for you to read and review:

Please notice
what is actually written in the first edition of Dr. Walvoord's
book. Four observations:
1.
The quote does appear as Mr. Van Kampen indicated.
2.
There are no quotation marks or footnotes to indicate that Dr.
Walvoord is quoting or paraphrasing Dr. Ladd. (Although the sentence
immediately preceding it does.)
3.
A normal reading would indicate that these are indeed the words
of Dr. Walvoord.
4.
Subsequent editions of Dr. Walvoord's book have a completely different
paragraph than what is written here.
It is my
hope that Dr. Couch simply did not have the time to do the proper
research on this matter and spoke without all the facts. At any
rate, Mr. Van Kampen is not in error.
This is
not the first time that Mr. Van Kampen has been accused of inventing
this particular quote. Why is it that pretribbers seek to disown
this quote? A careful analysis reveals that this quote should never
have been written by anyone who teaches that pretribulationalism
is the only correct biblical view of the rapture. For a view that
is held and defended with such conviction, one would think that
Scripture explicitly teaches it "in every word." Yet Walvoord
indicates that "the Bible does not in so many words state either."
Is it any
wonder that Dr. Walvoord left it out of all subsequent printings
of the book after the first edition and that writer after writer
deny that he wrote it?
Just for
the record.
After
the posting of the above, Dr. Couch responded in The Conservative
Theological Journal:
|
The
Conservative Theological Journal
April 30, 1998
In
the December 1997 edition of THE CONSERVATIVE THEOLOGICAL
Journal, we wrote that Robert Van Kampen, in his book THE
PRE-WRATH RAPTURE QUESTION ANSWERED PLAIN & SIMPLE,
misquoted Dr. John F. Walvoord in his earliest edition of
THE RAPTURE QUESTION.
Van
Kampen wrote that Walvoord said "... neither posttribulationism
nor pretribulationism is an explicit teaching of the Scriptures.
The Bible does not, in so many words, state either."
For
the article, I searched high and low for a copy of Walvoord's
book that would show that quote. I found none. I stated
the same in the article. I even talked with Dr. Walvoord
and Dr. Richard Mayhue. The exact quote could not be found.
But
a critic of the article and a supporter of Van Kampen said
that a copy was found at the library of Dallas Seminary.
From the first printing, a 1957 copy was discovered that
had originally been published by Dunham Publishing Company.
The statement was in that original volume but pulled by
Dr. Walvoord in later editions that was also published by
another press.
In
my December article on Van Kampen's book I stated honestly
that we attempted to find the quote. I even gave the quote
some benefit of the doubt by stating "in the quotes,
or misquotes ..." So in this sense we stand corrected.
Dr. Walvoord, over forty years ago, did print that statement...
Dr.
Mal Couch
Editor, The Conservative Theological Journal
|
|